Re: 91 9000T vs. 93 9000T PART 2 (ignore previous) - Saab 9000 Bulletin Board - Saabnet.com
The banner above is an advertisment - if it asks you to download software, please ignore.
Site News -
[General |
Members |
C900 |
9000 |
NG900 & OG93 |
93 |
95 |
NG95 |
99 |
Sonett |
Vintage Models |
Clubs |
Other Cars |
FAQs |
Gifts |
Member Photo Galleries |
Member Directory |
Classifieds |
Manuals |
*Buddy Registry |
*Mileage Registry |
Polls |
What's New |
Raffle |
Photo of the Month |
Sponsors]
[Main 9000 Bulletin Board | BBFAQ |
Prev by Date | Next by Date | Post Followup ]
Member Login / Signup - Members see fewer ads. - Latest Member Gallery Photos
Re: 91 9000T vs. 93 9000T PART 2 (ignore previous)
Posted by Rafe (more from Rafe) on Tue, 25 Sep 2001 00:04:13
In Reply to: 91 9000T vs. 93 9000T PART 2 (ignore previous), Nate, Mon, 24 Sep 2001 20:43:00
Members do not see ads below this line. - Help Keep This Site Online - Signup
Nate, thanks for the update.
The 91 does have the tighter, "Aero" suspension. The 93 does not (unless it is a 93-1/2 Aero as opposed to a 9000CSE Turbo as you described it).
The 91 is quicker because it's geared lower. The TCS is not much of a factor on dry pavement.
Many folks would tell you that the 93 TCS is a big problem. I have a 92 with the same TCS and my experience has been great, but there have been problems with some cars. And when you have TCS problems they are not always easy to fix.
I would go for the 91 in a heartbeat unless it has major deferred maintenance problems.
If it were me I would take the 91 to my trusted Indie SAAB service place for a thorough going over. These cars can be great if cared for; nightmares if neglected.
IMHO the 91Turbo is the best 9000 ever made.
Rafe
posted by 24.0.23...
Posts in this Thread:
- 91 9000T vs. 93 9000T PART 2 (ignore previous), Nate, Mon, 24 Sep 2001 20:43:00
- 91 vs 93 9kt detailed comparison, Eric, Wed, 26 Sep 2001 06:18:51
- Re: 91 9000T vs. 93 9000T PART 2 (ignore previous), John, Tue, 25 Sep 2001 15:47:16
- Re: 91 9000T vs. 93 9000T PART 2 (ignore previous), ACP, Tue, 25 Sep 2001 07:25:39
- '91 and '93 have same engine, saabaru, Tue, 25 Sep 2001 11:18:55
- Re: '91 and '93 have same engine, Jim Kane, Tue, 25 Sep 2001 14:06:27
- I thought 91 was the first year for trionic n/m, nickR, Tue, 25 Sep 2001 18:05:32
- Please explain these differences..., Nate, Tue, 25 Sep 2001 17:33:26
- True, forgot about that....nm, saabaru, Tue, 25 Sep 2001 14:23:18
- Re: 91 9000T vs. 93 9000T PART 2 (ignore previous), Rafe, Tue, 25 Sep 2001 00:04:13 <-- Viewing This Message
Members do not see ads below this line. - Help Keep This Site Online - Signup
Post a Followup
No Site Registration is Required to Post - Site Membership is optional (Member Features List), but helps to keep the site online
for all Saabers. If the site helps you, please consider helping the site by becoming a member.
StateOfNine.com
 |
SaabClub.com
 |
Jak Stoll Performance
 |
M Car Covers
 |
Ad Available
 |
Random Saabnet.com Member Gallery Photos (Click Image)
This is a moderated bulletin board - Posting is a privilege, not a right.
Unsolicited commercial postings are not allowed (no spam). Please, no For Sale or Wanted postings, SERIOUSLY.
Classifieds are to be listed in The Saab Network Classifieds pages.
This is a problem solving forum for over 250,000 Saab owners, so expect to see
problems discussed here even though our cars are generally very reliable. This is not an anything goes
type of forum. Saabnet.com has been a moderated forum since 1988. For usage guidelines, see the
Saabnet.com Mission and Purpose Page. Please remember that you are
not anonymous. Site Contact | Site Donations | Other Sites by SP -
Poverty2Prosperity.org | Run Club Menlo Park | ScreenBot
Site Members do not see red text instructions, bottom of the page anchor ads, or box ads.
Click here to see all
the Site Membership Benefits!