Re: 91 9000T vs. 93 9000T PART 2 (ignore previous) - Saab 9000 Bulletin Board - Saabnet.com
The banner above is an advertisment - if it asks you to download software, please ignore.
Site News -
5/28: SAAB Evolutions/TSN T-Shirts $14 |
5/23: SOC Day Pass Winners Announceed
[General |
Members |
C900 |
9000 |
NG900 & OG93 |
93 |
95 |
NG95 |
99 |
Sonett |
Vintage Models |
Clubs |
Other Cars |
FAQs |
Gifts |
Member Photo Galleries |
Member Directory |
Classifieds |
Manuals |
*Buddy Registry |
*Mileage Registry |
Polls |
What's New |
Raffle |
Photo of the Month |
Sponsors]
[Main 9000 Bulletin Board | BBFAQ |
Prev by Date | Next by Date | Post Followup ]
Member Login / Signup - Members see fewer ads. - Latest Member Gallery Photos
Re: 91 9000T vs. 93 9000T PART 2 (ignore previous)
Posted by John (more from John) on Tue, 25 Sep 2001 15:47:16
In Reply to: 91 9000T vs. 93 9000T PART 2 (ignore previous), Nate, Mon, 24 Sep 2001 20:43:00
Members do not see ads below this line. - Help Keep This Site Online - Signup
Nate,
I had a '91 9000t and I now own a '97 9000 Aero. Both great cars in all respects, but I liked my '91 better than my Aero. Don't get me wrong, the Aero is more dependable because of its age, but I feel that the '91 drove better. It was a little quicker due to the gearing and it felt slightly better throught the turns.
I also think the '91 looks better, the Areo body has a pointy nose and a big rear end. Where as the '91 body style had a smaller rear and a flatter front.
If you are setting your sights on a '91 you may want to hold out for one in better condition and possibly one with less miles. Though, my '91 had 162000 miles under its belt when it was totaled and it still ran perfectly.
Hope this helped-
-john
posted by 65.161....
Posts in this Thread:
- 91 9000T vs. 93 9000T PART 2 (ignore previous), Nate, Mon, 24 Sep 2001 20:43:00
- 91 vs 93 9kt detailed comparison, Eric, Wed, 26 Sep 2001 06:18:51
- Re: 91 9000T vs. 93 9000T PART 2 (ignore previous), John, Tue, 25 Sep 2001 15:47:16 <-- Viewing This Message
- Re: 91 9000T vs. 93 9000T PART 2 (ignore previous), ACP, Tue, 25 Sep 2001 07:25:39
- '91 and '93 have same engine, saabaru, Tue, 25 Sep 2001 11:18:55
- Re: '91 and '93 have same engine, Jim Kane, Tue, 25 Sep 2001 14:06:27
- I thought 91 was the first year for trionic n/m, nickR, Tue, 25 Sep 2001 18:05:32
- Please explain these differences..., Nate, Tue, 25 Sep 2001 17:33:26
- True, forgot about that....nm, saabaru, Tue, 25 Sep 2001 14:23:18
- Re: 91 9000T vs. 93 9000T PART 2 (ignore previous), Rafe, Tue, 25 Sep 2001 00:04:13
Members do not see ads below this line. - Help Keep This Site Online - Signup
Post a Followup
No Site Registration is Required to Post - Site Membership is optional (Member Features List), but helps to keep the site online
for all Saabers. If the site helps you, please consider helping the site by becoming a member.
StateOfNine.com
|
SaabClub.com
|
Jak Stoll Performance
|
M Car Covers
|
Ad Available
|
Random Saabnet.com Member Gallery Photos (Click Image)
This is a moderated bulletin board - Posting is a privilege, not a right.
Unsolicited commercial postings are not allowed (no spam). Please, no For Sale or Wanted postings, SERIOUSLY.
Classifieds are to be listed in The Saab Network Classifieds pages.
This is a problem solving forum for over 250,000 Saab owners, so expect to see
problems discussed here even though our cars are generally very reliable. This is not an anything goes
type of forum. Saabnet.com has been a moderated forum since 1988. For usage guidelines, see the
Saabnet.com Mission and Purpose Page. Please remember that you are
not anonymous. Site Contact | Site Donations | Other Sites by SP -
Poverty2Prosperity.org | Run Club Menlo Park | ScreenBot
Site Members do not see red text instructions, bottom of the page anchor ads, or box ads.
Click here to see all
the Site Membership Benefits!