1985-1998 [Subscribe to Daily Digest] |
[Main 9000 Bulletin Board | BBFAQ |
Prev by Date | Next by Date | Post Followup ]
Member Login / Signup - Members see fewer ads. - Latest Member Gallery Photos
Not necessarily Posted by Ari [Email] (#2847) [Profile/Gallery] (more from Ari) on Mon, 8 Jun 2009 07:21:43 In Reply to: Re: Octane vs. altitude, Simon S, Fri, 5 Jun 2009 15:41:27 Members do not see ads below this line. - Help Keep This Site Online - Signup |
Yes, most modern cars have control over timing. Retarding timing can prevent knock.
However, the control systems only have so much authority - they can't keep retarding the timing until the engine no longer knocks - at some point the engine no longer runs (where it doesn't knock, I guess.) So even with modern knock-avoidance systems, there is a minimum octane.
The same goes on the high octane end. The control system doesn't keep advancing the timing until it senses knock - running higher octane than necessary doesn't provide more performance.
So at high altitude with a N/A engine, you can run lower octane without knock. Just like at sea level, running higher than necessary octane provides no additional power. And at higher altitude, the N/A engine has less power because the effective compression ratio is lower; no amount of ignition timing twiddling will help with that.
posted by 192.249.47...
No Site Registration is Required to Post - Site Membership is optional (Member Features List), but helps to keep the site online
for all Saabers. If the site helps you, please consider helping the site by becoming a member.