Re: should freewheel be reintroduced? - Saab Vintage Models Bulletin Board - Saabnet.com
NG900 & OG93 |
Vintage Models |
Clubs & SOC |
Other Cars |
Member Photo Galleries |
Member Directory |
*Buddy Registry |
*Mileage Registry |
What's New |
Photo of the Month |
[Main Vintage Models Bulletin Board | Post Followup | BBFAQ ]
[ Prev by Date ] [ Next by Date ] Member Login / Signup [Latest Member Gallery Photos]
Re: should freewheel be reintroduced?
Posted by kansas (more from kansas) on Tue, 6 Jul 2004 17:10:47
In Reply to: should freewheel be reintroduced?, chuck, Tue, 6 Jul 2004 16:18:29
Hmmmm. If all drivers of a freewheel car could be trained in driving it, fuel savings would result. The problem is, you need to drive differently with it than without it, and there is no practical way to train all the potential drivers. Untrained drivers break freewheel mechanisms causing great agony and expense. And different handling/driving characteristics of freewheel cars handled by the untrained are bound to cause accidents. Sorry, nice idea, I can't support it.
Some misstatements have appeared in previous posts in the thread. Freewheel is not hydraulic. It was not invented in the US, or at least the SAAB version was not developed there; the principle of an overrunning clutch is old and there are many ways to achieve it. I will speculate that SAAB did not invent the 2-stroke engine that necessitated freewheel as well-explained above, but built on existing technology; and that likely earlier designs of other manufacturers also used 2-stroke engines that required similar fixes to keep from burning them up driving down long hills; but I cannot cite examples and would welcome elaboration.
The racing adaptations of driving technique with a freewheel car, mentioned by one poster, are admirable but completely irrelevant to the driving public, and a good thing too.
The system broke because drivers did not know how to use it. It may also have been underdesigned, there was a running change in the mechanism from 6- to 10-ball clutch (or vice versa).
Of course it can be fixed. Anything can. The question is, what are you willing to pay? It was made once and given information about how to construct the pieces, can be made again.
On cars made with the system, there was no extra cost to the customer, it was not an option. If you mean "What was the cost to incorporate freewheel into a transmission, as opposed to leaving it out," I would guess that as a few dollars per unit at the manufacturing level.
I applaud your practice of coasting downhill where engine braking is not required, and agree that this will improve fuel economy.
Bottom line: Nice idea, if you could get every driver lined up behind it then fuel savings would result, but you can't.
The freewheel on my '69 95 wagon is neutered, thanks to Jack Ashcraft.
posted by 198.69.252...
Posts in this Thread:
Post a Followup
No Site Registration is Required to Post - Site Membership is optional (Member Features List), but helps to keep the site online
for all Saabers. If the site helps you, please consider helping the site by becoming a member.
This is a moderated bulletin board - Posting is a privilege, not a right.
Unsolicited commercial postings are not allowed (no spam). Please, no For Sale or Wanted postings, SERIOUSLY.
Classifieds are to be listed in The Saab Network Classifieds pages.
This is a problem solving forum for over 250,000 Saab owners, so expect to see
problems discussed here even though our cars are generally very reliable. This is not an anything goes
type of forum. Saabnet.com has been a moderated forum since 1988. For usage guidelines, see the
Saabnet.com Mission and Purpose Page. Please remember that you are
not anonymous. Site Contact | Site Donations | Other Sites by SP -
Your address is: 22.214.171.124 - Using CCBot/2.0 (https://commoncrawl.org/faq/) - Logged.
Site Members do not see red text instructions, bottom of the page anchor ads, or box ads.
Click here to see all
the Site Membership Benefits!