[Subscribe to Daily Digest] |
| [Main Other Cars Bulletin Board | BBFAQ |
Prev by Date | Next by Date | Post Followup ]
Member Login / Signup - Members see fewer ads. - Latest Member Gallery Photos
Re: Agreed...... Posted by Snowmobile [Email] [Profile/Gallery]
(more from Snowmobile) on Sat, 14 Oct 2017 08:13:37
In Reply to: Agreed......, MI-Roger |
It also meant that the 9-3ss attracted a little bit different kind of buyer (someone looking for a price competitive option to a 3 series or a4) than the og9-3 hatchback. I feel that had a pretty big impact on SAAB's demise. Many c900/og9-3 owners here went on to imprezas or whatnot. Different body style than a sedan.
But SAAB was not exactly profitable with c900's or 9000s even though they cost a lot to buy. They were fairly expensive to produce also. There was a shift though in the type of buyer when you think back to the cost of a loaded c900 in 1989 vs the cost of a 9-3ss inflation adjusted in 2009.
, Wed, 11 Oct 2017 08:32:48
, Fri, 13 Oct 2017 12:23:03
, Sat, 14 Oct 2017 13:18:16
, Sun, 15 Oct 2017 02:52:24
, Fri, 13 Oct 2017 06:20:30
, Tue, 10 Oct 2017 15:16:11
No Site Registration is Required to Post - Site Membership is optional (Member Features List), but helps to keep the site online
for all Saabers. If the site helps you, please consider helping the site by becoming a member.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
