Re: it's certainly a valid resource - Saab Other Cars Bulletin Board - Saabnet.com
NG900 & OG93 |
Vintage Models |
Clubs & SOC |
Other Cars |
Member Photo Galleries |
Member Directory |
*Buddy Registry |
*Mileage Registry |
What's New |
Photo of the Month |
significance absolutely depends on sample size, that's statistics.
I know CR has had a good readership base, but how many contribute to their statistics vs simply read their magazines?
The other thing I take issue with is that in many of the products CR reports on, they may collect reasonable data on a subset of an item's market-perceived performance, but those things can be fairly irrelevant to what I'm looking for in that kind of product (eg ranking DVD players based on power consumption). Similarly, they sometimes do a weighting system that likewise is skewed in terms of what should probably be most important (eg reviewing a stereo system like a washing machine).
A car example of this might be as simple as "reported engine problems" which might simply be reported as a number or frequency of problems without the specifics (too hard to collect and present). So one brand might have lots of DIC failures, another might have lots of HG failures, and another timing belts or something else... and each of these problems has different consequences (cost, road hazard, engine life thereafter etc), so really are not comparable apples to apples. It is only apples to apples to a consumer who is uninformed: "my car broke".
I think if one takes a CR report with some degree of completeness of understanding, then it can serve a purpose. To take the headline "winners" of a CR report blindly and advocate for this can wildly misconstrue the truth.
All that said, I have no interest in ever owning an Accord or a Regal. Are they even really that comparable or target the same markets? I suppose Honda and Toyota sedans have increased their "grandpa popularity" in the last decade, so maybe?
Posts in this Thread:
- Buyer's Remorse - CR top 10, 2 Acura, 0 Buicks, cheaptech , Sun, 4 Mar 2018 07:22:04
- Re: Buyer's Remorse - CR top 10, 2 Acura, 0 Buicks, Justin VanAbrahams , Mon, 5 Mar 2018 12:51:35
- it's certainly a valid resource, AeroEd , Tue, 6 Mar 2018 16:45:43
- Re: Buyer's Remorse - CR top 10, 2 Acura, 0 Buicks, DE , Mon, 5 Mar 2018 15:43:14
- Re: Buyer's Remorse - CR top 10, 2 Acura, 0 Buicks, cheaptech , Mon, 5 Mar 2018 15:37:07
- Strong February for Regal, A1-turbo, Mon, 5 Mar 2018 05:42:17
- Re: Buyer's Remorse - CR top 10, 2 Acura, 0 Buicks, Norm9-5, Sun, 4 Mar 2018 18:26:35
Post a Followup
No Site Registration is Required to Post - Site Membership is optional (Member Features List), but helps to keep the site online
for all Saabers. If the site helps you, please consider helping the site by becoming a member.
This is a moderated bulletin board - Posting is a privilege, not a right.
Unsolicited commercial postings are not allowed (no spam). Please, no For Sale or Wanted postings, SERIOUSLY.
Classifieds are to be listed in The Saab Network Classifieds pages.
This is a problem solving forum for over 250,000 Saab owners, so expect to see
problems discussed here even though our cars are generally very reliable. This is not an anything goes
type of forum. Saabnet.com has been a moderated forum since 1988. For usage guidelines, see the
Saabnet.com Mission and Purpose Page. Please remember that you are
not anonymous. Site Contact | Site Donations | Other Sites by SP -
Your address is: 22.214.171.124 - Using CCBot/2.0 (https://commoncrawl.org/faq/) - Logged.
Site Members do not see red text instructions, bottom of the page anchor ads, or box ads.
Click here to see all
the Site Membership Benefits!