[Main Performance Bulletin Board | BBFAQ | Prev by Date | Next by Date | Post Followup ] Member Login / Signup - Members see fewer ads. - Latest Member Gallery Photos ok ... Like This Post: - Subscribe to Daily Digest for this Bulletin Board Posted by Kevin K [Email] (#374) [Profile/Gallery] (more from Kevin K) on Fri, 4 Oct 2002 14:36:08 In Reply to: Comments, Ragnar, Fri, 4 Oct 2002 02:28:00 Alert me when someone posts in this thread: Members do not see ads below this line. - Help Keep This Site Online - Signup

so ..

amm output always used with the main map, likely to be designed close to stoich mix so lambda can trim.

wot mode kicks out lambda, and adds x% more ms to main map value, based only on rpm.

------------------

remember, no chips in usa ..

added resistor should knock amm outpt by fixed %, and would be matched to upgraded injector. this should work for both closed loop and wot, as long as some limits are not exceeded. brad starts with 300 ohm for 30# inj's, stock 2.5 fpr.

Resistor should work well with bigger injectors at 3K torque peak, since still in range of amm, and stock inj duty cycle was likely low, like 60%. At high rpm, amm output could flat-line due to exceeding the amm capacity (220 hp per your note). Fuel flow could also be limited by exceeding the edge of the map's load axis, which would not be far away, given the small injectors used.

I understand the maps you showed are likely ms values, and wot correction a % increase of these values. also, load axis would be based on amm output vs some reference value at that rpm.

3 questions:

1) for the stock maps, and a specific rpm, what does the 100% load limit value represent? is it for one bar of boost?

2) are points on the map, that are beyond normal stock use, still accurate? maps u showed seemed to have ms drop at the high load end, for many rpm values.

3) what is stock max inj duty cycle (or ms), for typical wot at 160 hp and 5500 rpm?

thanks Ragnar for the info.


posted by 52.128.3...

• kevin 2.2 lh ecu Q, jak , Thu, 3 Oct 2002 19:05:16
  • Question..., bazil burns, Fri, 4 Oct 2002 09:07:54
    • Re: Question..., jak , Fri, 4 Oct 2002 10:36:49
  • open vs closed loop, Kevin K , Thu, 3 Oct 2002 21:54:08
    • Aaron Gilbert & I measured my AMM output, SteveY, Fri, 4 Oct 2002 15:45:16
      • I seem to remember that test.. :), Aaron Gilbert, Sat, 5 Oct 2002 00:10:01
    • kevin thanks again, JAK , Fri, 4 Oct 2002 08:39:53
    • Comments, Ragnar, Fri, 4 Oct 2002 02:28:00
      • ok ..., Kevin K , Fri, 4 Oct 2002 14:36:08 <-- Viewing This Message
        • Re: ok ..., Ragnar, Fri, 4 Oct 2002 15:12:29
          • could you elaborate on the enrichment?..., kooch, Sat, 5 Oct 2002 16:51:04
            • Re: could you elaborate on the enrichment?..., Ragnar, Sat, 5 Oct 2002 17:56:19
              • Re: could you elaborate on the enrichment?..., kooch, Sun, 6 Oct 2002 02:08:24
                • Re: could you elaborate on the enrichment?..., Ragnar, Sun, 6 Oct 2002 04:26:17
                  • so at about 0 C, enrichment is..., kooch, Sun, 6 Oct 2002 10:23:10
                    • Re: so at about 0 C, enrichment is..., Ragnar, Sun, 6 Oct 2002 14:40:14
          • Re: ok ..., Kevin K , Fri, 4 Oct 2002 17:33:55
    • OT about rrfpr, Brad, Thu, 3 Oct 2002 22:14:42
      • this would also explain some of the..., kooch, Sat, 5 Oct 2002 12:46:58
        • Re: this would also explain some of the..., Brad, Sat, 5 Oct 2002 21:47:08
          • i know that spg9 does offer...., kooch, Sun, 6 Oct 2002 10:25:37
      • Re: OT about rrfpr, Kevin K , Fri, 4 Oct 2002 01:09:30
      • Been pondering swapping out my RRFPR.., Aaron Gilbert, Fri, 4 Oct 2002 00:46:38
        • Re: Been pondering swapping out my RRFPR.., Kevin K , Fri, 4 Oct 2002 01:41:43
          • I have the Accel, so 24.3 @ 3.0 bar., Aaron Gilbert, Fri, 4 Oct 2002 12:23:48
            • Re: I have the Accel, so 24.3 @ 3.0 bar., Kevin K , Mon, 7 Oct 2002 17:42:40
            • how about 88 9KT w/ #30 ford & 3.0 fpr ? NM, ben, Sat, 5 Oct 2002 18:40:17

No Site Registration is Required to Post - Site Membership is optional (Member Features List), but helps to keep the site online
for all Saabers. If the site helps you, please consider helping the site by becoming a member.

• Prev by Date: Thanks for the info, decisions decisions...n/m, Savary, Fri, 4 Oct 2002 14:21:42
• Next by Date: Best Radar?, Adam, Fri, 4 Oct 2002 14:47:15
• Main Performance Bulletin Board

StateOfNine.com

SaabClub.com

Jak Stoll Performance

M Car Covers

Ad Available

The content on this site may not be republished without permission. Copyright © 1988-2024 - The Saab Network - saabnet.com.
For usage guidelines, see the Mission & Privacy Notice.
[Contact | Site Map | Saabnet.com on Facebook | Saabnet.com on Twitter | Shop Amazon via TSN | Site Donations]

Random Saabnet.com Member Gallery Photos (Click Image)