1979-1993 & 94 Conv [Subscribe to Daily Digest] |
[Main C900 Bulletin Board | BBFAQ |
Prev by Date | Next by Date | Post Followup ]
Member Login / Signup - Members see fewer ads. - Latest Member Gallery Photos
Re: LH 2.2-2.4 swap - Justin Van A can you help Posted by Larry West [Email] (#1140) [Profile/Gallery] (more from Larry West) on Thu, 4 Jun 2009 11:45:20 In Reply to: Re: LH 2.2-2.4 swap - Justin Van A can you help, AaronG, Thu, 4 Jun 2009 09:08:45 Members do not see ads below this line. - Help Keep This Site Online - Signup |
Huh? Where is it said that LH 2.2 is more reliable than 2.4?
When I switched my 1986 CV from 2.2 to 2.4, it was like night and day. Idle was spot on, every day, all day. Startup was much quicker (helped along by my DI/APC install, I'm sure). Also, I could actually read the codes of what was going on in the LH box, rather than just guessing.
No, for me, the LH 2.4 system is much preferred over the 2.2.
_______________________________________ Current: 2002 9-5 Aero Kombi Cosmic Blue 2000 9-5 SE sedan, Imola Red 1990 900S Rose Quartz, Auto Past: 1999 9-5 LPT Combi 1999 9-5 LPT sedan 2002 9-5 Arc 1990 900 5-speed 1986 900 turbo Convertible 1991 9000 turbo 1980 99 GLi 1986 900 turbo 1986 900 S 1991 900 turbo 1984 900 turbo 1976 99 GL
No Site Registration is Required to Post - Site Membership is optional (Member Features List), but helps to keep the site online
for all Saabers. If the site helps you, please consider helping the site by becoming a member.