[Subscribe to Daily Digest] |
 | [Main General Bulletin Board | BBFAQ |
Prev by Date | Next by Date | Post Followup ]
Member Login / Signup - Members see fewer ads. - Latest Member Gallery Photos
Agree and more... Posted by Caarma [Email]  (#592)  [Profile/Gallery]
(more from Caarma) on Mon, 25 Feb 2008 12:45:28
In Reply to: Thanks, Bob. As to your question,, Noel, Mon, 25 Feb 2008 11:28:55 Members do not see ads below this line. - Help Keep This Site Online - Signup |
Some people believe scientific or engineering models when it comes to crashworthiness of a car or the trajectory of a missile, but when it comes to global weather modeling, they don't believe it. It is the best we have, but one thing is clear. We don't have a spare earth to experiment with. Neither side can prove the other to conclusively right or wrong. If we screw up the one habitable planet we have, we're in trouble. To the naysayers, why risk it?
I was talking to a much older wealthy owner of a farming operation who said he wanted to shoot all the environmentalists. I told him I was one and we got into a semi-respectful argument. He said the government should regulate safety, but it had no place making environmental regulations. I thought that was an interesting and stupid argument since pollution can cause asthma and other afflictions. Safety is tied to health is tied to the environment. Cleaner is better. Using less is better.
Atul
http://www.thingsivenoticed.com
, Sat, 23 Feb 2008 08:05:50
, Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:03:24, Sun, 24 Feb 2008 07:56:02, Sun, 24 Feb 2008 06:14:46
, Tue, 26 Feb 2008 12:06:14, Mon, 25 Feb 2008 12:45:28 <-- Viewing This Message, Tue, 26 Feb 2008 11:17:47, Sun, 24 Feb 2008 20:04:00
No Site Registration is Required to Post - Site Membership is optional (Member Features List), but helps to keep the site online
for all Saabers. If the site helps you, please consider helping the site by becoming a member.
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
