1999-2009 [Subscribe to Daily Digest]
|[Main 95 Bulletin Board | BBFAQ |
Prev by Date | Next by Date | Post Followup ]
Member Login / Signup - Members see fewer ads. - Latest Member Gallery Photos
Re: 9-5 durability vs. similar vintage 9-3? Posted by Itsasaab [Email] (#2054) [Profile/Gallery] (more from Itsasaab) on Tue, 6 Feb 2018 17:05:26
In Reply to: 9-5 durability vs. similar vintage 9-3?, Devin [Profile/Gallery] , Mon, 5 Feb 2018 13:50:29 Members do not see ads below this line. - Help Keep This Site Online - Signup
My previous 2000 9-5 Arc wagon is still going at approx 280,000 with a new owner after I took it from 93,000 to 270,000 with regular care. Did plenty to it but it is a GREAT car.
My current 9-5 Linear wagon has gone from 52,000 to 95,000 in the last 12 months.
Have done bushings, a water pump and the regular wear items and its going great. Loving it. The only thing I really still don't like is that it does not have bluetooth and the GM effect. Oh well.
My vote is get that thing!!!
The service history - if it is good - is gold!
Yes stuff goes wrong on these things but it is within a pretty predictable range really.
It can seem like you are doing plenty to them, but when I hear other people talk about what they have go wrong on their cars of other brands I realize how unreasonably bad a name the Saabs have gotten.
Get that car! ..... and let us know how it goes?
No Site Registration is Required to Post - Site Membership is optional (Member Features List), but helps to keep the site online
for all Saabers. If the site helps you, please consider helping the site by becoming a member.