[Subscribe to Daily Digest] |
Which why he didn't really answer the bigger issues in your question and cherry picked a few thing repond to. It's all theory. Lets let GM and Chryler go bellyup because it suits my ideology and if you lose everything you have at 55 that's just too bad and what you get for being a dumb factory worker. Let's allow the banks to go under and see what happens because I'm 100% sure I know it'll be best in the long run and I'm willing to bet everything you have along with everything millions of other people have. Maybe it's the arogance of the minimalist government/tea party types that I find the most galling. They are just so absolutely sure it's going to work, but based on what? No one has successfully rolled back government to the extent these guys want to in modern times. We've seen this kind of arognance before. The Germans had it in the 30's and the communists were going to built a workers paradice. What they all found out was that theories don't always work out the way you think. I guess I can be thankful that "reality" is spouting off here instead of being in a position of power where he could do some real harm.
posted by 208.72.4...
No Site Registration is Required to Post - Site Membership is optional (Member Features List), but helps to keep the site online
for all Saabers. If the site helps you, please consider helping the site by becoming a member.