[Subscribe to Daily Digest] |
 | [Main General Bulletin Board | BBFAQ |
Prev by Date | Next by Date | Post Followup ]
Member Login / Signup - Members see fewer ads. - Latest Member Gallery Photos
Re: your response is typical Posted by Snowmobile [Email]  (#686)  [Profile/Gallery]
(more from Snowmobile) on Tue, 28 May 2019 04:29:07
In Reply to: Re: your response is typical, Navid S, Sun, 26 May 2019 21:41:44 Members do not see ads below this line. - Help Keep This Site Online - Signup |
Navid, I don't want to seem disrespectful - TSN is a great resource to fix our cars, and off topic posts on the General bb are a nice diversion. It is great to have people interested in a discussion of science, so please do not take my commentary the wrong way.
The link in your post above as well as the youtube video I have linked to below are examples of things I visited previously while doing a superficial look over this topic. I will be frank, these are not presented in a way that scientists present material, and statements like "my team knows more about Physics than MIT" really do not help your cause either.
Physicists are not out to get you. I can guarantee you that if there is a viable clean energy source as you describe, many many people will be interested in studying the processes behind it, both experimentally and theoretically. However, if Mills is indeed the next Isaac Newton, he would want to clearly demonstrate in a transparent way experimental evidence for his claims such that others can publicly replicate his findings and reinforce his work. Privately run studies not published in peer reviewed journals don't cut it.
Keep in mind, the claim here is very bold: that there are fractional energy states below the ground state of the most common element in the universe... and that nobody prior to Mills has observed the transition to these energy states in all the studying of hydrogen that has gone on in the past. It is not impossible that everyone missed something of this nature, but it is improbable and the onus is on the person making the claim to support the work in a way that is highly transparent.
To be fair, Mills has published a huge amount on the subject (though substantially in "unusual" journals). Others have reviewed his work and claim to have found mathematical inconsistencies that would completely invalidate his claims. The challenge here is that <1% of the population has enough mathematical background to understand any of this, so can not make an informed opinion.
It would be fun, when I have some time (which is not now) to go through his math and see if it makes any sense. I can't actually comment further until I do so, but please note that I would expect anyone stating "QM is a hoax" to fully explain why mathematically also.
For everyone's reference here is the wikipedia page re the current conventional understanding of the hydrogen atom (and some concise background on how it came about):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen_atom
Hand-wavy youtube video describing hydrino theory
1
, Thu, 16 May 2019 09:19:09, Thu, 30 May 2019 05:43:10, Tue, 28 May 2019 09:47:13, Tue, 28 May 2019 09:34:42
, Wed, 15 May 2019 13:20:431, Thu, 16 May 2019 09:20:073, Sun, 19 May 2019 19:43:55, Sun, 26 May 2019 21:20:27, Thu, 30 May 2019 05:54:11, Thu, 30 May 2019 10:14:22, Thu, 30 May 2019 12:50:33, Fri, 31 May 2019 06:18:48, Fri, 31 May 2019 08:58:56
, Thu, 30 May 2019 10:47:421, Thu, 30 May 2019 10:57:011, Thu, 30 May 2019 10:19:20, Thu, 30 May 2019 06:57:44, Thu, 30 May 2019 09:02:54, Tue, 28 May 2019 04:29:07 <-- Viewing This Message
, Wed, 29 May 2019 13:38:19, Wed, 29 May 2019 18:38:41, Mon, 27 May 2019 09:22:05, Tue, 14 May 2019 08:21:28
, Tue, 14 May 2019 19:23:27, Wed, 15 May 2019 16:52:29, Thu, 16 May 2019 23:15:201, Thu, 16 May 2019 11:52:59, Wed, 15 May 2019 18:51:06, Wed, 15 May 2019 08:30:19, Wed, 15 May 2019 10:32:22, Tue, 14 May 2019 19:30:31, Wed, 15 May 2019 16:49:52, Wed, 15 May 2019 15:34:21, Tue, 14 May 2019 19:56:13, Wed, 15 May 2019 07:32:32, Thu, 16 May 2019 22:45:46, Fri, 17 May 2019 14:01:26, Sat, 18 May 2019 03:58:49, Sat, 18 May 2019 05:48:33, Sun, 19 May 2019 11:08:46, Sun, 19 May 2019 14:04:43, Sun, 19 May 2019 08:45:11, Fri, 17 May 2019 06:33:51, Thu, 16 May 2019 00:47:281, Thu, 16 May 2019 14:10:27, Thu, 16 May 2019 22:17:211, Thu, 16 May 2019 14:34:391, Thu, 16 May 2019 22:33:12, Fri, 17 May 2019 10:10:45, Thu, 16 May 2019 17:00:02, Thu, 16 May 2019 21:52:521, Fri, 17 May 2019 10:32:44, Fri, 17 May 2019 06:58:211, Fri, 17 May 2019 20:07:18, Fri, 17 May 2019 20:16:01, Fri, 17 May 2019 23:16:06, Sat, 18 May 2019 04:07:20, Fri, 17 May 2019 10:15:58
No Site Registration is Required to Post - Site Membership is optional (Member Features List), but helps to keep the site online
for all Saabers. If the site helps you, please consider helping the site by becoming a member.
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
