The dyno is basically for comparison... - Saab Performance Bulletin Board - Saabnet.com
The banner above is an advertisment - if it asks you to download software, please ignore.
Site News -
[General |
Members |
C900 |
9000 |
NG900 & OG93 |
93 |
95 |
NG95 |
99 |
Sonett |
Vintage Models |
Clubs |
Other Cars |
FAQs |
Gifts |
Member Photo Galleries |
Member Directory |
Classifieds |
Manuals |
*Buddy Registry |
*Mileage Registry |
Polls |
What's New |
Raffle |
Photo of the Month |
Sponsors]
[Main Performance Bulletin Board | BBFAQ |
Prev by Date | Next by Date | Post Followup ]
Member Login / Signup - Members see fewer ads. - Latest Member Gallery Photos
The dyno is basically for comparison...
Posted by Chad (more from Chad) on Fri, 19 Sep 2003 07:36:02
In Reply to: Re: You may not be able to name your source, but, Karl [Profile/Gallery]
, Fri, 19 Sep 2003 03:37:19
Members do not see ads below this line. - Help Keep This Site Online - Signup
It doesn't matter if the Dyno was Static or Dynamic, the point is that most people that actually bother to dyno their rides, use Dynamic. So for tuning purposes that's what I'd go by. I'm sure EGT were higher than I'd be comfortable with, but the bottom line is that it did it. It happened, the car put 270 hp to the wheels on a dyno. If it were my own car I would definitely upgrade the intercooler and the injectors (I'm pretty sure Terry will too.) for the sake of consistancy and longevity, but in this small test, the car pulled harder each run. You have to check with Terry for the rpm that it hit 270 at, he's got the sheets.
posted by 12.14.115...
Posts in this Thread:
- Maptun vs. Engstrom, Turbo, Mon, 15 Sep 2003 22:13:57
- ENOUGH! Maptun and it's supporters have left a bad, kyle, Sun, 21 Sep 2003 18:42:58
- Here's a vote for MapTun........, zeke, Sat, 20 Sep 2003 05:35:28
- Re: Maptun vs. Engstrom, Alex Christopher, Thu, 18 Sep 2003 06:45:39
- A few key things about Engstrom......(longish)..., TERRY, Wed, 17 Sep 2003 09:34:21
- 2002+ 9-5 Aero upgrade issues, Dean, Wed, 17 Sep 2003 08:33:32
- Re: Maptun vs. Engstrom, Noah, Tue, 16 Sep 2003 18:43:29
- That was my car, (pic attached)....., TERRY, Wed, 17 Sep 2003 08:54:24
- Re: Maptun vs. Engstrom, sully, Wed, 17 Sep 2003 06:25:23
- Re: Maptun vs. Engstrom, Karl , Wed, 17 Sep 2003 02:01:28
- Maptun=overpriced! lets compare cost!Tal vs Map vs Sqr, ckpaden, Tue, 16 Sep 2003 18:34:53
- My vote is Engstrom, Chad, Tue, 16 Sep 2003 06:34:14
- I just got an SQR tuned stage III ecu from Engstrom, Steve88SiS, Tue, 16 Sep 2003 06:09:04
Members do not see ads below this line. - Help Keep This Site Online - Signup
Post a Followup
No Site Registration is Required to Post - Site Membership is optional (Member Features List), but helps to keep the site online
for all Saabers. If the site helps you, please consider helping the site by becoming a member.
StateOfNine.com
|
SaabClub.com
|
Jak Stoll Performance
|
M Car Covers
|
Ad Available
|
Random Saabnet.com Member Gallery Photos (Click Image)
This is a moderated bulletin board - Posting is a privilege, not a right.
Unsolicited commercial postings are not allowed (no spam). Please, no For Sale or Wanted postings, SERIOUSLY.
Classifieds are to be listed in The Saab Network Classifieds pages.
This is a problem solving forum for over 250,000 Saab owners, so expect to see
problems discussed here even though our cars are generally very reliable. This is not an anything goes
type of forum. Saabnet.com has been a moderated forum since 1988. For usage guidelines, see the
Saabnet.com Mission and Purpose Page. Please remember that you are
not anonymous. Site Contact | Site Donations | Other Sites by SP -
Poverty2Prosperity.org | Run Club Menlo Park | ScreenBot
Site Members do not see red text instructions, bottom of the page anchor ads, or box ads.
Click here to see all
the Site Membership Benefits!