[Subscribe to Daily Digest] |
[Main General Bulletin Board | BBFAQ |
Prev by Date | Next by Date | Post Followup ]
Member Login / Signup - Members see fewer ads. - Latest Member Gallery Photos
yeah... Posted by Justin VanAbrahams [Email] (#32) [Profile/Gallery] (more from Justin VanAbrahams) on Mon, 10 Oct 2005 14:20:47 In Reply to: True, but..., PhillySaaber, Mon, 10 Oct 2005 12:00:29 Members do not see ads below this line. - Help Keep This Site Online - Signup |
I was having a discussion with a buddy of mine on this topic just the other day. We're both IT-types - unionless, and I'd say generally taken advantage of. I don't get retirement, I don't get severence following a layoff. Hell, I don't get weekends, or nights for that matter. I am on-call 24x7, and the second someone with $5,000 buys their MSCE or CNA from a vocational school, I get a pay cut or a lay off since "qualified personnel are available for less money." Under California and Federal law normal salary/hourly criteria does not apply to me, and I am almost universally exempt - meaning I don't have to worry about 40-hour workweek limits, or getting paid pesky overtime.
IT workers are the blue collar workers of the 21st century. I keep my job by being smarter and agreeing to work harder than the next guy. I make my employers see it my way by doing things others can't, and by proving how invaluable I am to them on a daily basis.
Did unions serve their purpose? Sure they did. But like any big bureaucratic organization, their original goal of better conditions for workers have been replaced with the same goal that all big organizations have: Protect themselves at any cost. Banning or outlawing unions would certainly be the wrong choice, but compulsory membership isn't good for anyone.
My very limited $0.02...
posted by 216.57....
No Site Registration is Required to Post - Site Membership is optional (Member Features List), but helps to keep the site online
for all Saabers. If the site helps you, please consider helping the site by becoming a member.